"The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy,
but a love of one's country deep enough to call her to a higher standard"
-George McGovern
This tables shows the advantages and disadvantages of smart growth and urban sprawl communities.
As you can see the advantages or strengths of smart growth heavily out weigh that of urban sprawl. The disadvantages of smart growth are much easier to combat than are the weaknesses or disadvantages of urban sprawl. The lifestyle that comes with smart growth is far superior for every age group and most types of people in America.
Urban sprawl affects America negatively in four main ways -
When we look at the carbon footprint of an average sprawl home we get -
The carbon footprint of an average suburban American is 12.2 – Assuming they:
-Live in a single family home
- With three bedrooms
- Four residents
- Drive a van made in 2005 and travel 10-15K a yearWhere as the carbon footprint of an average smart growth American is -
The carbon footprint of an average urban American is 4.9 – Assuming they:
-Live in a five unit apartment complex
--Three bedrooms
-- Four residents
-Two seater car made in 2005 and travel 100-1000The biggest difference between the two lifestyles comes from the use of transportation. In a smart growth area it would be easier for residents to walk to work or to go get groceries. It also makes a large difference to live in a multi-unit complex.
Smart growth is also environmentally savvy because it focuses on redeveloping rather than compromising farmland or parks.
Smart growth can also positively affect Americans health.
In a smart growth area people are more likely to be physical active because of walkability and the advalibilty of parks.
No comments:
Post a Comment